Residential building permit pre-review

Find permit issues before submission.

See the issue. Trace the evidence. Know what to fix.

PlanPort reads the package, checks extracted evidence against configured requirements, and recommends next actions for issues it identifies.

Finding 1 of 3

A2.03 · Main floor plan

Synthetic demonstration drawing

Synthetic residential main-floor plan used to demonstrate traceable permit review
Evidence-backed findingOpen

Bedroom egress opening dimensions not shown.

Source location
Floor plan · A2.03
Configured requirement

OBC 9.9.10.1. · legacy catalog

Egress Windows or Doors for Bedrooms

Recommended action
Add the clear-opening width, height, and opening area to the bedroom window schedule.
Responsible role
Architectural designer
Evidence remains linkedHuman-verifiable

01

Understand the package

Drawings, forms, matrices, reports, and scanned PDFs are reviewed together.

02

Check configured requirements

Package evidence is compared with enabled code sources and municipal checklists.

03

Resolve findings

Each issue is tied to its source, rationale, responsible role, and next action.

What you get before you submit

One review built for verification—not a black-box score.

PlanPort organizes what it found into three practical views: what is in the package, where documents disagree, and which findings need a person to act.

Package readiness

Required items found

Permit applicationIncluded
Drawing setIncluded
Schedule 1Included
Project data matrixIncluded
Energy formIncluded

Cross-document consistency

Values compared

Building area

A0.01 · data matrix

Review

Building height

A3.01 · application

Aligned

Project address

4 documents

Aligned

Extracted values still require human confirmation.

Finding with evidence

What needs attention

Needs reviewFINDING 1

Bedroom egress opening dimensions not shown.

Source
Floor plan · A2.03
Requirement
OBC 9.9.10.1. · legacy catalog
Next action
Add clear-opening dimensions.
Rule sources and authority

Maintain sources once. Keep their authority distinct.

Platform sources can be reused across projects, while municipality, project type, source status, and explicit project selections determine which configured records enter a review.

National model-code context remains separate from provincial and municipal authority.

SourceAuthority

Ontario Building Code (legacy)

O. Reg. 332/12

Provincial regulation

National Building Code of Canada

2025

National model code

Mississauga addition requirements

Current municipal page

Submission checklist

Upload a residential submission. Find issues with evidence. Fix with confidence.

PlanPort supports permit pre-review. It does not replace qualified designers, architects, engineers, or municipal authorities.

Start a submission